Tier 1: Foundational
L1

Chat & Copilot: Done By You.

L1 is human-in-the-loop chat. Person prompts, edits, decides. No durable business memory, no internal data unless pasted, no execution beyond the turn. The starting line for roughly 80% of middle-market companies, and the place most stall.

Adoption
~80%
Orchestration
The human
Implementation
$150-350K
Time to tier
3-6 months
EBITDA lift
50-150 bps
Definition

A real but bounded productivity layer.

L1 is per-employee uplift on tasks already being done. The economic value is 10-30% productivity on a per-seat basis. Real. But no process is redesigned, no workflow captured, no institutional knowledge accumulated. The "AI ROI" stories that fill quarterly board decks largely live here, and they hit a ceiling fast.

Underneath L1 sits the data foundation: warehouses, ingestion, governance. No agent orchestration exists at L1 by category. Data orchestration (Airflow, Dagster, Prefect) is the ancestor, necessary, but not the same animal.

What L1 actually looks like in a portfolio company

FunctionIn practiceSignal
Engineering80%+ Cursor / Claude Code adoption, the single highest-ROI L1 move+15–25% PR throughput
FinanceClaude / ChatGPT drafts commentary, variance and the deck, numbers still from ExcelFlash P&L 10d → 3d
MarketingBrand-voice drafting; the editor still ships the final copy−40–60% draft time
Sales / RevOpsPower BI or Looker is the system of record; AI doesn't touch it yetOne governed dashboard
LegalAI flags deviations from the playbookLawyer makes the call
The ceiling

Done by you, which is exactly the limit.

At L1 a person still runs every step; AI just makes one of them faster. Real uplift, but a faster headcount, not a cheaper function. What changes at L3 is who does the work.

L1
CopilotDone by you
Person does the work
Gather DraftAI Check Decide Send
Faster person, same process · cost-per-seat
vs
L3
Workflow AgentDone for you
Agent runs the workflow
Gather Draft Check Decidehuman Send
tools · memory · retry
Process redesigned, runs without people · cost-per-task

Same workflow, different question: who does the work. L1 makes the person faster; L3 takes the workflow off their plate.

Vendor matrix

The named picks at L1.

Middle-market calibrated. BOD doesn't hedge.

CategoryBOD PickWhyPricing signal
General chatCLClaude (Team/Enterprise)Best long context (1M), strongest writing, portable Skills~$25-30/seat/mo
Chat (M365 shops)MSMicrosoft 365 CopilotLives where work lives; Graph permissions inherited$30/seat/mo Ent
Chat (alt)GPChatGPT EnterpriseBroadest ecosystem; Workspace Agents$20-25 Biz, Ent negotiated
CodingCCClaude Code & Cursor78% SWE-bench; MCP-native; lowest tokens/task$20-125/seat/mo
ResearchPXPerplexity EnterpriseBest cited research; replaces ad-hoc googling$20-40/seat/mo
Data SoTDatabricksDatabricks (BOD default) · SnowflakeDatabricks default; Snowflake for analytics-first / SQL-onlyConsumption-based
IngestionFivetranFivetranLowest time-to-first-rowPer MAR tier
Transformdbtdbt CloudSQL-first, engineering-rigor modelingPer developer seat
GovernanceUCUnity Catalog / Horizon / AtlanNative first; Atlan when multi-platformBundled / quoted
ObservabilityMCMonte CarloBOD primary at L1+ for data observabilityTiered enterprise

BOD positioning

L1 is the substrate. Treat it as serious infrastructure work, not as "we bought Copilot, we're good." A clean L1 unlocks every tier above it. A dirty L1 means every agent above it lies confidently.

Forward-deployed use cases

Where L1 is creating measurable value today.

Engineering

Cursor / Claude Code at 80%+ seats

The single highest-impact L1 move. PR throughput +15-25%. Reduces dependency on hiring against a backlog. Sets up an L3 graduation when the org is ready to put coding agents in CI.

Finance

Flash P&L in 3 days

Close-cycle commentary, variance drafting, board narrative, copilot-assisted. CFO draft time down materially. Doesn't redesign the close; speeds the human running it.

Marketing

Brand-voice drafting

Content drafting time -40-60%. Editor still ships. Sets up the L2 graduation to brand-grounded retrieval and the L3 graduation to autonomous draft-to-publish.

Legal

Contract review copilot

Deviations from playbook flagged; lawyer makes the call. The L2 graduation is a full retrieval index over the contract library; the L3 graduation is the deal-desk feed.

Sales / RevOps

One BI dashboard, well-governed

The unglamorous L1 win. Identity resolution on leads. One system-of-record for revenue. Nobody automates a number they can't agree on.

HR

HRIS headcount-to-plan

Headcount, plan, gap: clean and grounded. The L2 graduation is recruiting Q&A over the policy library; the L3 graduation is the recruiting agent.

Anti-patterns

How L1 stalls.

  • License sprawl, usage drought. Everyone gets a seat; under 20% weekly active by month 3.
  • Treating it like search. "What's our policy on X" hallucinates because nothing is grounded. Fix is L2, not better prompts.
  • Banning instead of governing. Legal blocks it; employees use personal accounts; data leaks with no audit trail.
  • No prompt library. Every employee reinvents the wheel weekly.
  • Mistaking model quality for outcome. Swapping GPT-4 for Claude Opus doesn't change the fact that nobody redesigned a process.
Graduation signals

What L2 looks like.

  • Saved Custom GPTs / Claude Skills in active use by named teams.
  • A retrieval connector (Glean, SharePoint, Drive) live for at least one team.
  • Someone owns "AI enablement" as real % of their job, not a side project.
  • Reporting dashboard for usage, not just licenses.
  • A workflow that needs your knowledge, not the internet's, to be useful.

L2: Connected Intelligence →

Diagnose your L1 in two hours.

An Edge Assessment is a read-only six-dimension assessment of your data and AI foundation. We tell you what tier you're at, what's blocking the next move, and what the 90-day plan is. Credentials deleted at engagement close.

Request an Assessment